I am currently in the final stages of writing up my PhD-thesis, so not much time to blog. I’ll be back soon, but in the mean time, here are some fresh critter pictures from Raja Ampat to keep you happy!
It has been quiet on the blog, mostly because I spent a few weeks recharging my batteries in Europe. But it’s action time again now and there is lots of cool stuff going on! So a short blog to bring you up to speed.
The last weeks I’ve had the pleasure of exploring some new places in Europe and meeting up with friends I had’t seen for too long. One of the highlights of the trip was that I’ve finally managed to snorkel Silfra fissure in Iceland. Silfra is a gorge in the Thingvellir national park, a rift valley between the North American and Eurasian tectonic plates. So snorkeling in the Silfra fissure means that you are basically snorkeling between two tectonic plates, and it’s quite the experience. Besides being very cold (it was -12°C outside and 2°C in the water), it has the coolest topography and amazing visibility, up to 100m!
The Europe trip ended with a visit to the University of Tubingen, where I met up with people that do some exciting research on fish biofluorescence. The lab does some very cool work, like investigating how fish see the world, whether or not they can see fluorescence, etc. It was very interesting to talk with them and learn about their research, and fun to share my work with them.
Which brings me to what’s happening my research. I am now at the very last push of my PhD, with less than 3 months to go before submitting my thesis. There is still work to be done, but I’m happy that multiple papers are currently in review, and will hopefully be published this year. Two of those papers will be of big interest to scuba divers and photographers. One of them might even cause some commotion all the way into zoos and aquaria. I will share them here as soon as they have gone through the review process.
Lastly, some really exciting news about future work. Last month I received a grant from the Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund to run a project that will benefit one of the world’s most endangered seahorses. Together with my friend Louw, which you might remember from her guestblog, we will be looking at new ways to detect the endangered Knysna Seahorse (Hippocampus capensis). Louw and me will be collaborating with the TrEnD lab in Perth to make a difference in the conservation of this beautiful critter. This project will start immediately after handing in the PhD, so I will be able to share new critter insights for a while longer.
This is the second guestblog by Daniel Geary, resident marine biologist and frogfish-enthusiast at Atmosphere Resort in Dauin, Philippines. You can read his first blog here. In this new guestblog Daniel explores the history of frogfish research and provides an introduction to a few common and not-so-common frogfish species.
There are many places across the globe where divers can see frogfish, but the Philippines (especially the Dauin area) is one of the best frogfish destinations of them all. I have personally seen thirteen species in this country, including 11 species here in Dauin. Sometimes we will see over 30 individuals on a single dive! It is not uncommon for some of the frogfish to stay on the same site for over a year, especially Giant Frogfish. Another great destination for frogfish is Indonesia, especially Lembeh, Ambon, and also some places in Komodo. Generally, if there is good muck diving, there is good potential for frogfish action. Australia also has some unique frogfish species, as well as the Caribbean, where there are a few places with reliable frogfish sightings.
Although frogfish are relatively well known critters to divers in the Indo-Pacific, this has not always been the case. Stories of frogfish and their accompanying drawings and sketches have existed for hundreds of years, with encounters spanning the globe. The first ever documented frogfish comes from Brazil. At some point before 1630, a drawing was given to the director of the Dutch West India Company. A woodcut was made from this drawing, and that woodcut was published in 1633. The first color drawing appeared in 1719, published by Louis Renard, an agent to King George I of England. He published a collection of color drawings of Indo-Pacific fish and other organisms and some of these represent the earliest published figures of Indo-Pacific frogfish. One was called Sambia or Loop-visch which translates directly to “walking fish.”
Albertus Seba and Philibert Commerson were two important scientists in the 1700s when it comes to frogfish. Seba believed frogfish were amphibians and tried very hard -incorrectly of course – to prove that they were the link between tadpoles and frogs, although anyone who has seen a baby frogfish knows this to be false. Even though he incorrectly identified a few nudibranchs as juvenile frogfish, he was still able to identify two species, the Hairy Frogfish (Antennarius striatus) and the Sargassumfish (Histrio histrio) during his studies. Commerson was the first scientist to focus solely on frogfish. He was a botanist and naturalist employed by the King of France and he described three species from Mauritius (Painted Frogfish – Antennarius pictus, Giant frogfish – Antennarius commerson, Hairy Frogfish – Antennarius striatus).
There have been plenty of identification problems when it comes to frogfish, even today. Frogfish colorations and patterns are highly variable, so it is nice to know people have been struggling with frogfish identification for hundreds of years. Albert Gunther, a scientist who attempted describe the different species of frogfish, said in 1861 that “[their] variability is so great, that scarcely two specimens will be found which are exactly alike…although I have not the slightest doubt that more than one-half of [the species] will prove to be individual varieties”. He listed over 30 species, but only 9 of those species are still accepted today. Since 1758 there have been over 165 species described and over 350 combinations of names. Currently there are around 50 accepted species, roughly one third of the total species described.
FROGFISH SPECIES PROFILES
Painted Frogfish – Antennarius pictus
This is the most abundant frogfish species in the Indo-Pacific. They can be identified by having 3 distinctive spots on their tail. They prefer to live near sponges, rocks, ropes, mooring blocks, and car tires. They can grow to a maximum size of around 15 cm.
Sargassumfish – Histrio histrio
This is the species with the largest distribution. They can be found in floating seaweed or debris as well as anchored seaweed and other marine plants. They can reach a maximum size of around 15 cm and are often sold in the marine aquarium trade.
Psychedelic Frogfish – Histiophryne psychedelica
This is one of the rarest frogfish species. They are only found in Ambon, Indonesia at a handful of dive sites, usually at around 2-3m hidden in rock crevices or in coral rubble.
Giant Frogfish – Antennarius commerson
This is the biggest frogfish species, reaching lengths of more than 40 cm. They prefer to live on sponges and have two large spots on their tail, as well as lines coming from the eye and enlarged dorsal spines.
Ocellated Frogfish – Nudiantennarius subteres
This frogfish species is the “newest” frogfish species. Originally thought to be a new species, it turns out this species is the previously described, relatively unknown “Deepwater Frogfish”, although the lure is incorrect in the original drawing. It was thought that the adults lived deep and only the juveniles were found in the shallows, but adult mating pairs of this species have been seen at less than 10m depth. They grow to around 5 cm.
This is blog is a story about more than just a new publication, it is also the story of how I became a full time marine biologist. The publication might have come out only last month, but its story began more than 5 years ago on an expedition site in the Philippines…
It is on that site where I met my good friend Eva, who asked me at the end of the expedition if I wanted to join her on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) for a couple of months of fieldwork. At that point I had no idea that we would be studying cleaner wrasses and parasites, but who would say no to such an offer?
So November 2012 found Eva and me in a tiny plane, on our way to Lizard Island while enjoying the amazing views over the GBR. The fantastic research station on Lizard Island would be our home for more than three months while we were conducting a series of experiments designed by Dr. Lexa Grutter, one of the world’s experts on cleaner wrasses and fish parasites.
The experiments we were doing are part of a much larger project that’s been ongoing since the year 2000. The base of the project are 16 small patch reefs, half of which have had their cleaner wrasse removed from the start of the project, and the other half was left alone. To make sure the “removal reefs” stay cleaner wrasse-free, they are regularly checked for new cleaner wrasse, which are removed when found. This amazing setup makes it possible to see how reefs without cleaner wrasse are different from reefs with cleaner wrasse.
Our particular experiment was designed to test if the number of gnathiid parasites (basically the mosquitos of the sea) were different when there are no cleaner wrasses on a reef. Cleaner wrasse eat the parasites off fish, but it’s unclear if they eat that many that it has an effect on the total number of parasites on coral reefs. The best way to count parasites is by using living fish as bait, Eva and me used the beautiful thicklip wrasse (Hemigymnus melapterus – aka “Hemis”). Our lovely hemis were put in traps which were placed on the different reefs for 12 hours. The traps are specifically designed containers that let the smell of fish out, and would allow parasites to enter, but not to escape.
We did two main sampling periods, each three weeks long, centered around the full moon. During sampling, our daily routine was to get up well before sunrise, collect the fish that were put out the night before, and deposit a new batch of fish. The main part of the day we would collect the parasites from the traps, and tend to our Hemis and their aquaria. At sunset we would collect the morning traps + fish and deposit a new batch of traps + fish. The days ended with collecting the daytime parasites. I can say in all honesty that I haven’t done such a tiring, but simultaneously exciting fieldwork experiment since.
The work we did provided only half of the data, more data was collected from similar experiments conducted by other colleagues, using different fish species. Afterwards there was a lot of lab work done by yet other collaborators, who counted and identified all the parasites. Only then could the data by analysed and written up. Sometimes experiments are quick and easy, sometimes they take a massive team effort!
So the results are in now, and they are very cool. The main story is that when cleaner wrasse are present on a coral reef, they indeed have an effect on how many parasites infest fishes. But… The effect only happened by day, and only for big fish species such as our thicklip wrasses. For smaller fish species like damsel fish, there was no difference whether or not cleaner wrasse were present on the reef. Also very interesting is that cleaner wrasse only have an effect on the parasites that are active by day.
What does this all mean? In short, it seems to indicate that cleaner wrasse not only directly remove parasites from fish, but they do it so efficiently that it keeps the parasite numbers down in the areas where they clean fish. This is in turn good news for all the other fish on the reef, as living in an area with less parasites is much better for your health than living in a place full of parasites. Just think about it, how much would you enjoy living in a mosquito-ridden swamp? This experiments shows that cleaner wrasse are at least partially responsible for removing the mozzies from your swamp!
This paper means more than that to me, it means very fond memories of tiring sampling sessions, crazy-pants parties, beach runs, sunset drinks, meeting some fantastic people,… But more than that, the work involved made me realise how much I enjoy doing research, and it is what made me decide to pursue a PhD in marine science. So being able to write a blog about this paper while I am in the final stages of writing up my PhD thesis very much feels like things have come full circle.